2 Tongren County Forestry Workstation, Huangnan, 811300, China
3 Qinghai Forest Seedling Station, Xining, 810000, China
4 Prefecture Forestry Bureau Jiangxi Forest Farm in Yushu, Qinghai, Yushu, 815000, China
Author Correspondence author
Molecular Pathogens, 2022, Vol. 13, No. 2 doi: 10.5376/mp.2022.13.0002
Received: 31 Mar., 2022 Accepted: 10 Apr., 2022 Published: 29 Apr., 2022
Bao S.C., Xiawulatai, Yin G.J., A X.Z., and Bai L.C., 2022, Isolation and identification of pathogens of poplar stem diseases, Molecular Pathogens, 13(2): 1-6 (doi: 10.5376/mp.2022.13.0002)
Since 2017, Populus cathayana in Shuangshu Nursery, Huzhu County, Qinhai Province has suffered from extensive necrosis of branches, yellow pith tissue, cracks from bark to pith in severe cases, brown mucus outflow in summer, yellowish brown pith, and no obvious disease. In this study, symptom observation, specimen collection, pathogen isolation and culture, morphological observation and molecular biological identification were carried out on poplar branch diseases. After the pathogen was isolated, cultured and purified, a pure bacterial strain H1 was obtained and its pathogenicity was tested. The results showed that the pathogenic bacterium H1 caused the disease of Populus cathayana plants, which was consistent with the disease symptoms in the field. Through morphological observation and molecular sequence analysis, the pathogen H1 was identified as Pantoea agglomerans, which can cause poplar bacterial canker. This study identified the pathogen of Populus cathayana branch disease in Huzhu country, which can provide basis for the prevention and control of the disease.
Poplar bacterial canker disease was first discovered in France in 1960, and gradually spread throughout Europe, Canada and the United States. Since Xiang et al. (2001) discovered poplar bacterial canker caused by Erwinia in Zhaodong in 1982, the condition and etiology of this disease have been systematically studied. It was preliminarily determined that poplar bacterial canker in Northeast China was caused by ice nucleation bacteria (ING) in Gracilicutes (Xiang et al., 2001). Related studies have shown that ING include: Pseudomonas. ananas Scrrano, Erwinia. Urodovora Dye, Pseudomonas. syringae pv. syringae Van Hall, Pseudomonas.syringae pv. Lachrymans (Smith & Bryan) Dye), Pseudomonas syringae pvs. and Erwinia herbicola (Lohins) Dye (Ren, 2011). There are various hosts of poplar bacterial canker pathogen, without obvious host and regional specificity (Zhao, 1992). Relevant studies have shown that P. agglomerans can also cause walnut bacterial blight (Wang et al., 2016), peach tree canker and Chinese cabbage canker (Guo, 2019), etc. Maize brown stalk rot was first identified in South Africa, caused by Pantoea ananatis and Pantoea sp. of Pantoea, resulting in a serious reduction in maize production in some countries of South African (Goszczynska et al., 2007). At present, this pathogen is mainly distributed in Heilongjiang, Jilin and Liaoning provinces with poplar as its host in China, and has become a major forest disease in Northeast China. Seedlings, young forests and mature forests can occur to varying degrees, and seedlings and young forests are most affected. Poplar bacterial canker belongs to the Quarantine Pests for Import Plants to the People's Republic of China (Yao, 1996, China Agriculture Press, pp.12-27).
In this study, P. agglomerans was first detected on poplar hosts in Shuangshu Nursery, Huzhu County, Qinghai province in Northwest China, causing poplar bacterial canker. After several sampling investigations, it was found that the disease was serious from May to August every year, and the average mortality rate of Populus cathayana in the nursery was 30%, with a maximum of 55% (Fang, 1998, China Agriculture Press, pp.6-416). Poor overall growth and high mortality, resulting in huge economic losses to the seedling cultivation industry. Therefore, this study sampled and investigated the incidence of poplar disease in the Shuangshu Nursery of Huzhu County, and isolated and identified the pathogens. It provides scientific basis for effective prevention and control of poplar diseases in the nursery and further research, and contributes to local ecological construction and environmental protection.
1 Results and Analysis
1.1 Symptoms disease of Populus cathayana
The bark of diseased trees was black and moist. Yellow pith tissue, cracks from pith to bark in severe cases. Pith from the early yellowish to black, brown mucus outflow. The xylem of the branches of the disease is yellowish, extended up and down. From the cross sectional view of the typical specimens (Figure 1A; Figure 1B), both roots and branches occurred, and gradually developed from heartwood to sapwood, presenting a ring structure. Longitudinal section (Figure 1C) showed that the pith is completely black and dead, and the xylem is yellow. After the bark is removed, cracks in the diseased part are clearly visible (Figure 1D). Leaf curl, leaf margin black, water loss, slightly dry phenomenon (Figure 1E). It is speculated that this disease has developed seriously, the xylem up to the branch, down to the root, the whole from inside to outside withered yellow necrosis, leaf wilt, wither, the whole plant died.
Figure 1 Disease symptoms of Poplar cathayan Note: A,B: Cross sectional view; C: Longitudinal section; D: Fracture map of diseased part; E: Leaf morphology |
1.2 Pathogenicity detection
A total of 1 strain was isolated from this disease specimen. After repeated culture, observation, selection, morphological identification and molecular fragment sequence analysis, a pure bacterial strain H1 of Pantoea was obtained, and the pathogenicity was detected by in vitro inoculation. The inoculated branches were placed in an incubator at 28℃ for culture. After 30 days of inoculation, strain H1 was inoculated (Figure 2A; Figure 2B), yellow pith and black between xylem and phloem, which can be peeled by hand. The symptoms are similar to those in the forest, and the control group has no symptoms (Figure 2C). The reisolation was carried out to obtain the same strain as the tested strain. Again, the pathogenicity of the isolated strain was detected according to Koch postulates, and the results were consistent with the initial test results, in line with Koch postulates, which proved that the isolated strain H1 was a pathogenic bacterium.
Figure 2 Symptom of Poplar cathayan after artificial inoculation with pathogen Note: A,B: Pathogenicity tests of strain H1; C: Sterile water control |
1.3 Morphological identification
Pathogenic bacteria H1 was cultured in beef extract peptone medium (pH 7.4~pH 7.6) in a constant temperature incubator at 28℃, and then a single colony was obtained by streak plate, usually cultured for 18~48 h. Strain H1 was grayish white with smooth surface and clear edge at the beginning (Figure 3A), and turned yellow and smelly at the later stage of culture. Strain H1 was identified as Gram-negative bacteria by Gram staining (Figure 3B). Strain H1 was rod-shaped under electron microscopy, without periflagella (Figure 3C).
Figure 3 Colony morphology and microscopic examination of strains H1 Note: A: Colony morphology of strain H1; B: Gram stain H (×100)); C: Electron microscopy (sem) image H1 |
1.4 Molecular biological identification
Primers 27F/1492R (Weisburg et al., 1991) were used for PCR amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA gene. The amplified product was detected by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and specific fragment H1 was obtained (Figure 4). After sequencing, the fragment was 1 100 bp, and the homology comparison results showed that the 16S rRNA sequence of strain H1 was 100% homology with P. agglomerans (GenBank number: CP034148). Strain H1 was identified as P. agglomerans (GenBank number: MT499447). Then, 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree of H1 was constructed by the Neighbor-joining method of MEGA 5.2 (Figure 5). Strain H1 and Pantoea agglomerans (GenBank number: CP034148) clustered on the same branch, and P. agglomerans was further confirmed as the pathogen of poplar bacterial canker by morphological characteristics and molecular biological identification.
Figure 4 Electrophoresis figure of PCR amplified product Note: M: DL2000 DNA Marker; H1: The strainH1; H2: H1 repeat |
Figure 5 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree of H1 |
2 Discussion
The isolation, identification and pathogenicity tests of the pathogens of poplar stem diseases in Shuangshu Nursery, Huzhu County, Qinghai province showed that Pantoea agglomerans was the pathogen of poplar stem disease. Pantoea agglomerans belongs to the genus of Pantoea in Enterobacteriaceae, Enterobacterales, Gammaproteobacteria, causes plant canker. Gavini et al. (1989) established a new genus of Corn fusarium wilt in Erwinia and named it as Pantoea, which is widely found in plant surfaces, soil and animal bodies. Beji et al. (1988) and Gavini et al. (1989) found that Pantoea includes two species P. dispersa and P. agglomerans. Subsequently, E. ananas (Kageyama et al., 1992) and E. stewartii (Zhu et al., 2006, Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology, 16(9): 1006) were also classified as Pantoea. P. agglomerans is a model strain of Pantoea, which can cause plant canker.
Since 1986, Xiang and Shao (1992, Northeast Forestry University Press, pp.119-129) have systematically studied poplar bacterial canker disease in Northeast China. The results showed that after poplar was infected with the disease, elliptic small nodules were formed on the branches in the early stage, and gradually increased, with rough surface and longitudinal cracking, and brown mucus flowed out in summer, with a bad smell. Xylem initially began to change color from the heartwood to the edgewood, showing a ring, and the outermost was white. On beef extract peptone medium, the colony was round, smooth surface, complete edge, gray white. At the later stage of culture, insoluble yellow pigment was produced, and the colony was pale yellow, translucent and slightly sticky. Gram staining was negative, and the flagella was peripherally sparse and curved. Compared with Xiang et al. (2001), in this study, the strain H1 isolated and purified after being infected with poplar was observed by electron microscopy on the basis of culture characteristics, pathogenicity detection and staining observation, etc. The morphological characteristics of pathogenic bacteria were observed, and no peripheral flagella was observed, indicating slight differences in cell morphology. The 16S RNA sequence of H1 amplified by PCR further confirmed that H1 was P. agglomerans of P. gavini.
Xiao et al. (2017) simultaneously isolated P. agglomerans and Xanthomonas arboricola from walnut specimens. P. agglomerans had weaker virulence to walnut leaves and fruits than Xanthomonas arboricola, and there was a compound infection phenomenon. In this study, a large number of pathogenic bacteria H1 was isolated from the poplar strain with strong pathogenicity and serious harm. It has not been reported in Northwest China that P. agglomerans caused poplar bacterial canker. This study did show that P. agglomerans infected poplar in Shuangshu Nursery, Huzhu County, Qinghai province in northwest China and caused serious poplar bacterial canker. It provides the basis for the prevention and control of poplar stem diseases in the nursery.
3 Materials and Methods
3.1 The situation of sample plot
The Shuangshu Nursery of Huzhu County is one of the state-owned nurseries directly under the jurisdiction of the Forestry Bureau of Huzhu County, with the largest seedling area in Qinghai Province. East longitude 36°44′52.29″, north latitude 101°54′24.29″, altitude 2 430 m, annual precipitation 460 mm, annual average temperature 3.4℃, is a cool temperature climate. P. cathayana is an important economic plant in local nurseries. In recent years, there have been serious diseases in the branches and stems of poplar in the nursery, and it is difficult to cultivate the seedlings. Seedlings, young forests and mature forests were be infected with diseases in varying degrees, causing serious losses to the forestry production in the nursery (Figure 6).
Figure 6 The situation of sample plot Note: A,B: Fracture map of diseased part; C,D: Cross sectional view |
3.2 Sample collection, isolation and purification
The typical disease specimens were collected in P. cathayana forest area of Shuangshu Nursery in Huzhu County. The method of collection is to select the infected parts from the diseased plants, cut them with branch shears and saws, take them back to the laboratory, wash them with running water, observe and photograph the symptoms of the victims. Then, the diseased tissues were isolated and cultured by tissue separation method (Fang, 1998, China Agriculture Press, pp.6-416). The pith and the junction of xylem disease were cut into small cubes of about 0.5 cm×0.5 cm, and soaked in 70% alcohol for 15 s. Then the surface was disinfected with 0.1% HgCl2 for 25 s, rinsed with sterile water for 3 times, dried with sterilized absorbent paper, and cultured in beef extract peptone medium at 28℃. After repeated separation and purification, bacterial strain H1 was drawn as a single colony by streak plate to obtain the purified strain, which was then stored in a refrigerator at 4℃ for use.
3.3 Morphological identification of pathogenic bacteria
The colony morphology, color and smell of the purified bacterial strain H1 were observed. Gram staining was performed to determine negative, and scanning electron microscopy was taken to observe the morphological structure.
3.4 Pathogenicity detection of pathogenic bacteria
Koch postulates were used for verification (Fang, 1998, China Agriculture Press, pp.6-416). Healthy four-year-old poplar seedlings were used in cross section by needle injection (Manners, 1979). The isolated bacterial solution of 1×108 cfu/mL (Xiao et al., 2017) was prepared, and the bacterial solution was injected into the pith of poplar and the junction with xylem with sterile syringe, and sterile water was dropped every 6 h for constant temperature culture. Each strain was repeated 3 times and inoculated with sterile water as CK. The inoculated branches were placed in an incubator at 28 ℃ for culture.
3.5 Molecular biological identification of pathogenic bacteria
All the bacterial pathogens H1 were negative by Gram staining, and then DNA extraction of two bacterial strains was carried out: single colonies were selected and placed in a centrifuge tube filled with 1 mL sterile double distilled water, centrifuged at 12 000 r/min for 2 min, and the supernatant was discarded. Then, by boiling method (G€ssow and Tim, 1989), 500 μL sterile double distilled water was added to the centrifuge tube, and the centrifuge was placed in 92℃ water bath for 5 min and centrifuged at 12 000 r/min for 2 min. The above clear liquid was used as a template. The PCR primer pairs were 27F (5‘-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1492R (5’-TACGACTTAACCCCAATCGC-3’). PCR amplification procedure: pre-denaturation at 94℃ for 5 min; In the PCR cycle, 94℃ for 30 s, 52℃ for 45 s, 72℃ for 1 min, 30 cycles. Finally, extension at 72℃ for 8 min (Li, 2013). The above PCR products were detected by 10 g/L agarose gel electrophoresis with Goldview, and the effect of genomic DNA extraction of isolated pathogenic bacteria was analyzed according to the electrophoresis pattern. To verify the stability of the method, the number of DNA extraction and PCR amplification tests was appropriately increased, and each test was repeated 3 times. The amplified products were then sent to the sequencing company (Shanghai Sangon Biotech) for sequencing. Blast search was performed on GenBank for sequences with high similarity, and homology comparison was performed.
Authors’ contributions
BLC was the designer and director of this experimental study. XWLT and YGJ participated in the design of the experiment; AXZ participated in sample collection; As the executor of this experiment, BSC carried out disease investigation, sample collection, isolation and identification of pathogens, and finally wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Science and Technology Cooperation Program for Youth (2020-QY-209) of Qinghai Provincial Science and Technology Department.
Beji A., Mergaert J., and Gavini F., Izard D., Kersters K., Leclerc H., and Deley J., 1988, Subjective synonymy of Erwinia herbicola, Erwinia milleliae, and Enterobacter agglomerans and redefinition of the taxon by genotypic and Phenotypic data, Int. J. Syst. Baeteriol., 38(1): 77-78
https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-38-1-77
G€ssow D., and Tim C., 1989, Direct clone characterization from plaques and colonies by the polymerase chain reaction, Nucleic Acids Res., 17(10): 4000
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.10.4000
PMid:2734114 PMCid:PMC317898
Gavini F., Mergaert J., Beji A., and Mielcarek C., 1989, Transfer of Enterobacter agglomerans (Beijerinck 1888) ewing and fife 1972 to Pantoea gen. nov. as Pantoea agglomerans comb. nov. and Description of Pantoea dispersa sp. nov, International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 39(3): 337-345
https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-39-3-337
Goszczynska T., Botha W.J., Venter S.N., and Coutinho T.A., 2007, Isolation and identification of the causal agent of brown stalk rot, a new disease of maize in south Africa, Plant Disease,91(6): 711-718
https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-91-6-0711
PMid:30780480
Guo M., 2019, Identification and Resistance Identification Methods of Pantoea agglomerans, New Pathogen of Chinese Cabbage Soft Rot, Thesis for M.S., Northeast Agricultural University, Supervisor: Zhang Y.W., Zhao Y., pp.7
Kageyama B., Nakae M., and Yagi S., 1992, Pantoea punctata sp. nov. Pantoea citrea sp. nov. and Pantoea terrea sp. nov. Isolated from Fruit and Soil Samples, International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 42(2): 203-210
https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-42-2-203
PMid:1581180
Li Y., 2013, Study on fungi and bacterial communities in bark of populus 107 and populus 46 infected with Canker Disease, Dissertation for Ph.D., Graduate School of Beijing Forestry University, Supervisor: He W., pp.23
Manners J.C., 1979, Plant breeding for disease resistance, Nature, 279(5708): 86
https://doi.org/10.1038/279086a0
Ren F.J., 2011, pathogen identification of poplar canker in Europe and America, Thesis for M.S., Beijing Forestry University, Supervisor: He W., pp.1-10
Wang H., Wang R.J., Tian F.M., Zhao S.L., He J.J., Li Z.H., Wang Y.F., Zhuo P.Q., and Wang M.X., 2016, Identification and pathogenicity assay of pathogen of blight disease on walnut trees in Longnan, Fujian Nongye Xuebao (Journal of Fujian Agriculture), 31(10): 1086-1090
Weisburg W.G., Barns S.M., and Pelletier D.A.., 1991, 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study, Journal of Bacteriology, 173(2): 697-703
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991
PMid:1987160 PMCid:PMC207061
Xiang C.T., Song F.Q., Liu J.H., Dong A.R., Xue H., Yuan S.Z., Zhang J.H., Jiang X.D., Shi F.X., Wang C.W., Lin H.B., and Han W.X., 2001, The dominant factors caused by poplar INA Bacterial canker, Dongbei Linye Daxue Xuebao (Journal of Northeast Forestry University), 29(3): 109-113
Xiao B., Lu S.D., Yang B., Chen Y.H., Ze S.Z., and Zhao N., 2017, Isolation and identification of walnut bacterial black spot pathogen in Yunnan, Guilin Nongye Kexue (Guizhou Agricultural Sciences), 45(12): 55-58
Zhao S.G., 1992, Present status of research on Dothiorella gregaria of poplar, Xibei Linxueyuan Xuebao (Journal of Northwest Forestry University), (7): 122-128
. PDF(805KB)
. HTML
Associated material
. Readers' comments
Other articles by authors
. Shancun Bao
. wulatai Xia
. Guangjing Yin
. Xiaozhu A
. Luchao Bai
Related articles
. Populus cathayana
. Pathogen identification
. Pantoea agglomerans
Tools
. Email to a friend
. Post a comment